

|
 |
|
Bureau
of Land Management Grazing Permittee Information
In August 2007, WildEarth Guardians and Western
Watersheds Project submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for information related to the agency's
grazing program, including the names and addresses of corporations, partnerships
and individuals permitted to graze BLM land. The BLM, citing privacy issues,
refused to disclose these data for certain permittees. The two conservation
organizations sued the agency in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Idaho for withholding the information.
On September 13, 2010, the federal court ruled in favor of WildEarth Guardians
and Western Watersheds Project, finding that "the public interest
in monitoring the BLM's rangeland program outweighs the minimal privacy
interests held by [grazing] permittees" in their names and addresses.
[Memorandum
Decision and Order
]
As the court noted, permittee names and addresses are key to understanding
other information about BLM's grazing program. The court also acknowledged
a substantial public interest in the federal public lands grazing:
"
the Court finds that there is a
substantial public interest in understanding the scope of the grazing
and rangeland program, particularly in light of the environmental impacts
associated with grazing and the amount of tax dollars spent on the grazing
program itself. Understanding the scope includes knowing how many individuals
or entities actually graze cattle on public lands, as well as the size
and scope of their operations. Because the only way to determine this
information is from release and cross referencing of the requested information,
the Court finds that a substantial public interest exists."
The court's opinion received extensive
coverage in the news media
and the New York Times editorialized
in favor of the decision .

|