|

|
 |
|
NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release
December 3, 2004
Contact:
Mark Salvo, Sagebrush Sea Campaign · (503) 757-4221
Lead Petitioner Reacts to "Not Warranted" Recommendation to
Protect Sage Grouse
SAN DIEGO - Conservationists
were disappointed, but not surprised by news that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service has recommended that the Bush Administration deny protection to
the greater sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act.
"Sage grouse have suffered precipitous declines
in recent decades," said Mark Salvo, Director of the Sagebrush Sea
Campaign. "A listing would have required the federal government to
protect sagebrush habitat where the sage grouse lives. By not listing
the species, damaging activities will be allowed to continue on much of
the sagebrush steppe, to the detriment of sage grouse and scores of other
wildlife species."
The historic range of sage grouse closely conformed
to the distribution of sagebrush in what became sixteen Western states
and three Canadian provinces. But since 1900 sage grouse populations have
been reduced; the species no longer occurs in Arizona, British Columbia,
Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, and Oklahoma. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service has acknowledged that sage grouse numbers have declined between
69 and 99 percent in recent decades. The total sage grouse population,
estimated at 140,000 individuals, represents only about eight percent
of historic numbers.
"Our attorneys will be reviewing the
final decision when issued, and advising us on our legal options,"
noted Salvo. "The only science upon which the Bush Administration
based this decision was political science. They are paying back their
political base in the grazing and oil and gas industries."
# # #
|