|

|
 |
|
NEWS RELEASE
For Immediate Release
January 19, 2006
Contact:
Erik Molvar, Wildlife Biologist,
Biodiversity Conservation Alliance · 307/742-7978
Clait E. Braun, former Avian Research Program Manager, Colorado Division
of Wildlife
520/529-0365
Linda Baker, Upper Green River Valley Coalition ·
307/367-3670
Mark Salvo, Director, Sagebrush Sea Campaign ·
503/757-4221
Study Shows Major Impacts of Gas Development on Sage Grouse
LARAMIE - A ground-breaking study on greater
sage grouse in western Wyoming has found that oil and gas development has
major impacts on sage grouse populations under current Bureau of Land Management
policies.
The study, funded by the BLM and the oil and gas industry, was completed
last December by University of Wyoming doctoral student Matt Holloran, who
studied sage grouse populations in western Wyoming where natural gas drilling
has dramatically increased in the past three years.
"This study is going to change the debate on sage grouse and oil and
gas development," said Erik Molvar, a wildlife biologist with Biodiversity
Conservation Alliance. "The BLM won't be able to tell the public that
their standard oil and gas practices and mitigation measures will protect
the sage grouse anymore. New ideas and cutting-edge technologies must be
implemented if oil and gas is to become compatible with sage grouse survival."
The study found that oil and gas development has a major impact on grouse
behavior at lek sites, the traditional dancing grounds that sage grouse
return to year after year to breed. Drilling activities within 3.1 miles
of sage grouse leks caused declines of breeding males. And more surprising,
the impacts continued even after drilling and construction activities ceased.
The number of breeding males failed to recover within 1.9 miles of producing
wells (which typically remain on site from 30 to 50 years) even after drilling
is completed.
"Sage grouse biologists have been belaboring BLM and state agencies
to adopt stronger measures to protect the sage grouse from oil and gas development
for years, but these recommendations have fallen on deaf ears. Hollorans's
study validates the 1977 and 2000 Guidelines published by the Western Association
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies in peer reviewed technical journals,"
said grouse expert Clait E. Braun. "The study by Holloran now provides
irrefutable evidence that the scientific community was right, and that a
fundamental change is needed in the way the oil and gas industry does business
in sage grouse country if we are to maintain this majestic emblem of the
West," Braun added.
The study covers sage grouse populations in the Pinedale Anticline and Jonah
Fields, two major developing gas fields in western Wyoming's upper Green
River valley. Leks affected by gas development showed an average population
decline of 51 percent, while the three leks surround by development declined
by an average of 89 percent. Two of these three leks were completely abandoned
within 4 years. The study found that if the sage grouse continues to decline
at the rates measured, local populations within these gas fields would become
extinct within 19 years.
The study has West-wide implications, because most of the oil and gas development
in the West is occurring in the sagebrush basins that are the core strongholds
of remaining sage grouse populations. "The results of this study indicate
that rapidly accelerating energy development could severely reduce sage
grouse populations in the heart of the species' range," said Mark Salvo,
director of the Sagebrush Sea Campaign. "If current trends continue,
oil and gas development, in combination with other land uses, will likely
drive the sage grouse toward extinction."
"The long-term declines of the sage grouse are serious, if this species
is to remain viable and to occur within all states and provinces within
its historical range," added Braun. "If major increases in oil
and gas development occur within key habitats for sage grouse, Holloran's
study clearly indicates that local extinction of populations will occur
within the next 20 years. Extinction of local populations results in a highly
fragmented distribution of sage grouse."
Holloran concluded that "greater sage-grouse in western Wyoming avoid
breeding within or near the development boundaries of natural gas fields,"
(p. 56), and recommended establishing "refugia" areas adjacent
to oil and gas fields. Here, sage grouse populations could be protected
and enhanced to re-establish well-field populations after the eventual departure
of the oil industry.
"During the upcoming revision of the Pinedale BLM Resource Management
Plan, some areas in the valley like the Wind River Front must be considered
as inappropriate for oil and gas leasing and development, to allow safe
harbor for reservoir populations of sage-grouse, and to replace those grouse
that no longer inhabit densely developed gas fields," said Linda Baker
of the Upper Green River Valley Coalition.
"In the southern Red Desert, oil and gas fields already underway or
currently being approved stretch across more than 2,750 square miles,"
Molvar said. "If these projects are approved by the BLM for full-field
development, there will be no breaks in between them to provide refugia
for sage grouse."
"This area encompasses one of the two largest sage grouse lek concentrations
in Wyoming, in the proposed Creston - Blue Gap and Atlantic Rim project
areas," Molvar added. "Even though all of this area is prime sage
grouse habitat, I don't see how sage grouse will survive here unless the
BLM takes a fundamentally different approach to oil and gas development
than it has in the past."
The study, conducted by Matt Holloran through the Cooperative Fish and Wildlife
Research Unit at the University of Wyoming, was funded by the Bureau of
Land Management, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, and the oil and gas
industry. A brief synopsis of the study's findings follows.
#
# #
|