![]() |
NEWS RELEASEFor Immediate ReleaseJanuary 12, 2009
New
Listing Decision for Gunnison Sage-grouse? Telluride,
Colo. - The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service filed a notice with the U.S.
District Court in Washington, DC, last week stating that, in light of
the latest investigative report on Bush Administration interference in
the administration of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the agency may
reconsider its position in current litigation over its refusal to protect
Gunnison sage-grouse under the ESA in April 2006. The investigative report,
released in December, was the second by the Inspector General for the
Department of the Interior that found that former-Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Interior Julie MacDonald and other Bush Administration officials
unduly influenced the listing decision making process for imperiled species,
including Gunnison sage-grouse. The Fish and Wildlife Service indicated
in its court filing last week that it will decide whether to continue
defending the tainted "not warranted" Gunnison sage-grouse listing
decision within the next 45 days. "We are eager to secure this vital protection
for the Gunnison sage-grouse as soon as possible. Long term viability
of the species is unquestionably at risk now, and every additional delay
decreases the likelihood of a full recovery," said Commissioner Joan
May of San Miguel County, Colorado. San Miguel County led a coalition of conservation
and government accountability organizations to sue the Fish and Wildlife
Service over its "not warranted" listing decision for the Gunnison
sage-grouse in November 2006. Significant evidence was already available
that Julie MacDonald and other officials had interfered
with the listing decision for the species. The latest report by the
Inspector General confirms previous information that Bush Administration
appointees pressured Fish and Wildlife Service biologists and other staff
to avoid protecting species under the ESA. "Our campaign to save the Gunnison sage-grouse
is also a campaign to preserve America's West for future generations.
Do we sacrifice this species for the immediate gain of finite resource
extraction or do we conserve, develop alternatives and drill where it
will not have such immense impacts?" commented Hilary White, Director
of Sheep Mountain Alliance. "We hope that our new leadership will
make an informed science-based decision to protect Gunnison sage-grouse."
Audubon, another organization that joined San
Miguel County and Sheep Mountain Alliance in the listing litigation, has
identified Gunnison sage-grouse as among the ten
most endangered birds in the United States. "This is an easy decision for the Fish and
Wildlife Service to make," said Mark Salvo, Director of the Sagebrush
Sea Campaign for WildEarth Guardians. "The Gunnison sage-grouse population
is now smaller than when federal biologists recommended listing and designating
critical habitat for the species in 2005." The Gunnison sage-grouse is distinct from greater
sage-grouse, identified by researchers as early as the 1970s and recognized
as a new species by the American Ornithologists' Union in 2000. While
its historic range may have included parts of Colorado, Utah, New Mexico,
and Arizona, the species now occurs only in eight small populations in
southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah. Gunnison sage-grouse have
experienced significant declines from historic numbers and only about
4,000 breeding individuals remain. Livestock grazing, energy development,
motorized recreation, and urbanization have contributed to the long-term
decline of Gunnison sage-grouse. Gunnison sage-grouse inhabit sagebrush steppe,
among the most threatened ecosystems
Fish and Wildlife Service filings in the Gunnison
sage-grouse listing litigation are available here
A factsheet on Gunnison sage-grouse is available
here * * * |
|||